Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sat Jun 4 13:46:32 2005

On 6/4/05 11:18 AM, "David Teo" <reddawn@singnet.com.sg> typed:

> Hi
> 
> it's a pity no one has had commercial success with full frame sensors
> except Canon.
> 
> Both the Kodak offerings and the Contax N1 Digital had so much
> potential......
> 
> ----------
> David Teo
> 
I can easily skip that 24x36 digital format for the near to medium future
and just go from the 1.5x crop format (23.7 x 15.6mm) to the format I'd get
with a digital back on my Hasselblads. Something to the tune of 37mm square
at the minimum I think. Those are coming down and have approached certainly
the price of a Canon S. body.

Some calcs:
23.7 * 15.6 = 369.72
24 * 36 = 864
37 * 37 = 1369 Hasselblad Ixpress V96C $9.7k
There are smaller ones for cheaper.
49 * 36.7 = 1798.3 Sinar Back 54M 15-20k
 


Mark Rabiner
Photography
Portland Oregon
http://rabinergroup.com/





Replies: Reply from reddawn at singnet.com.sg (David Teo) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)
In reply to: Message from reddawn at singnet.com.sg (David Teo) ([Leica] Leica DMR vs. Canon 20D comparison shots)