Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina Manley answered feli: Subject: Re: [Leica] 35 f1.4 pre-ASPH > I think it's the charm that seduces ;-) I love my pre-Asph lux but only > when I want the photo to have a certain charm - old, pre-Asph, glow, > whatever-you-want-call-it. It's not stellar but it is a "look" that it's > hard to duplicate even with Photoshop CS2!<<< I bought one as my first 35mm lens along with 3 M4's and 3 other lenses and I never thought of it in any other manner than it was a 35mm lens. :-) Of course since joining the LUG some years ago I've learned all kinds of reasons why people buy Leica lenses, heck I just bought them because I needed them for my work and they were fast. ;-) Glow? Leica whatever effect? Heck it's a damn fine lens and I still have it since I bought it in 1967 and it's got about a half million miles on it. No lens hood, well part o one. It finally fell apart because it was banged so often the outer part got all bent up and Leica wanted an enormous amount of money to replace it. So I threw away the front part and kept the inner section that's still attached to the lens. And that's the way it is today. :-) Good pictures? You betcha, well OK captured moments on film, as it still makes fine 16X20 prints by available light or available darkness! Although a couple of years ago I bought the CV 35 f 1.2 and it's a cracker jack lens working in similar light. I probably use it more than the Leica 35 1.4 these days. ted