Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 9:16 PM +0530 5/12/05, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote: >I totally disagree - software companies are more likely to become >extinct than manufacturing companies - remember Micropro (Wordstar) >or Lotus or Borland. On the other hand Leica, Rollei & Hasselblad >still survive. >Cheers >Jayanand > >----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerry Walden" <gwpics@aol.com> >To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> >Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:14 AM >Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Nikon D2X review now PS BS > >>I think there is more likelihood of .dng being around in the long term >>future than there is any proprietary file format supported by an >>individual camera manufacturer. >> >>Gerry >> The point is that this is expressly _not_ about a software company. DNG makes it irrelevant, or at most inconvenient whether a specific software company is around, as the DNG standard is published and available for any other software company or competent programmer to write a converter for. Once you have taken your digital negative (open standard) and fiddled it with Photoshop and then saved it with layers and channels in Photoshop, then you will need Photoshop or a Photoshop compatible program to read it, but your original 'negative' will still exist in a non-proprietary format. So in 50 or whatever years you might not be able to read the Photoshop file with the tweaks and intermediate layers, but your original negative will still be available to you. I think that is worth something, and Adobe is to be commended for that. BTW, saving it to TIFF is not like saving as DNG. DNG contains a fair bit more information, and is a lot smaller to boot. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com