Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/fastlensreview.shtml >Thanks for the input. The article requires energy but worth it. I am >impressed by his keen observation and straightforward writing. (...) >Surely, this is for lens aficionados. >Best, >MIKIRO >Japan Mikiro, Adam I agree the article is very interesting, thanks for the link. Nothing really new in the f1 to f1.5 sector, but it confirms once more the superior sharpness of the 'Lux ASPH lenses wide open and in the corners; with the 50 Nokton as runner-up and the old fast Canons as the masters of softness and vignetting. I'm very disappointed about the 35 Biogon at f2: rather unsharp in the middle - even the 43 year old Canon 35/2 performs a little better in the middle, and the 1.7 Ultron beats it hands down. In the corners, the Biogon's sharpness compares much better, but it's quite dark - vignetting that much? It seems to me that the Cosina Voigtlander are better than the Cosina Zeiss. In a way most of us are lens aficionados - it's the lens that has more influence on a picture's look, not the camera. Didier