Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Photojournalists and permission
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Tue Apr 19 17:52:06 2005
References: <00c101c544fd$f7e0d9d0$6501a8c0@ccapr.com><42658E9D.3050705@cox.net><a0600102dbe8b44827604@gpsy.com><42659B44.5040502@cox.net> <a06001031be8b4eb9db00@gpsy.com>

> If we have that right (many lawyers would call it a moral right to our own 
> image), then what gives us the authority to claim that homeless -- because 
> of their circumstance -- have given up all moral rights to the use of 
> their own image and privacy?  Because they are poor? Because they are 
> living on the street?


Precisely.   People on the public street may be photographed without their 
permission.   That is basic.   It doesn't matter if they are homeless or the 
Queen of England.   The public street is public. 



Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Photojournalists and permission)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Photojournalists and permission)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Photojournalists and permission)
Message from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] Photojournalists and permission)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Photojournalists and permission)
Message from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] Photojournalists and permission)