Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Something doesn't jive about this - the DigiluxII's sensor is smaller than the 4/3 sensor. I think it's just over 1" in diagonal (I'm sure less lazy people than I can find it on the dpreview site). So if the digilux's pics are better, than it has to be either - better lens - better software By almost all accounts, including Erwin Puts', the Digital Zuiko lens are top notch, so is the difference than software? At 05:22 PM 4/10/2005, Don Dory wrote: >.... >Ok, accept the premise that the Canon guys had better computer geeks who >were doctoring the images before sending them to print. The DIMA guys >did a comparison test of the E-1 against the Digilux II. Same lighting, >same model, same computer work, same printer: the end result was that at >16X20 the Digilux II had a better image both in color, lower artifacts, >and in total image quality. It was close, looking at the images, but >the Digilux did have the better image. >... // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com)