Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:Leica M3 purchase
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Thu Apr 7 07:58:42 2005
References: <2867578BB7767E45B3C9E3CBA9C5A65F97081B@smskpexmbx3.mskcc.root.mskcc.org>
 
My first lens for my M3 was a 35/3.5 Summaron M. It was an M2 Summaron, no
eyes. I just used the full VF on the M3. Worked well for 3 years until I got
a 35/f2 and finder.

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Saganich, Christopher/Medical Physics" <Subject: RE: [Leica] Leica M3
purchase


> Well not really.  A 2.8 Summaron with goggles is a great starter lens on
an M3 especially if you're on a budget.  The goggles reduce the VF to about
a 0.85, but that isn't too bad.  The M3 viewfinder is a sight to behold.
>
> Christopher Saganich
Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Spring Photo)
 In reply to: Message from saganicc at mskcc.org (Saganich, Christopher/Medical Physics) ([Leica] Leica M3 purchase)