Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Alkaline vs Silver 625 replacement batteries
From: jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier)
Date: Thu Apr 7 06:05:34 2005
References: <040720050202.16788.425494B8000295DE00004194220075115004040A990A02D201D202080106@comcast.net>

Alkalines vary the voltage over the life of the battery, silver's 
voltage remains constant until it goes into sudden death. I happily 
used silvers in my converted camera.

John Collier

On 6-Apr-05, at 8:02 PM, John O. Newell wrote:

> This is probably a dumb question; in fact, I hope it is, but I'm 
> cautious about making assumptions.  I'm wondering whether anyone has 
> had, or can think of, any issues in using a silver 625 cell in a 
> camera that originally used a mercury 625 cell but has been 
> recalibrated for an alkaline 625  cell.  This would be a change from 
> 1.5v nominal to 1.55v nominal, which seems like it would be a 
> difference so small that it would be easily lost in the noise 
> (examples: didn't precisely center needle; didn't pick precisely 
> correct area to meter) or at least would be well within the latitude 
> of even color reversal film.  Yes/no/maybe?
> Also, I'm assuming...but interested in confirmation...that there are 
> no physical differences between the alkaline and silver oxide 
> dimensions?  I have read of users with problems using the CRIS 
> adapters.


In reply to: Message from john.o.newell at comcast.net (John O. Newell) ([Leica] Alkaline vs Silver 625 replacement batteries)