Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/03/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Or the Zeiss Planar - Re: [Leica] Seeking a new 50
From: masonster at gmail.com (David Mason)
Date: Fri Mar 25 10:45:11 2005
References: <4243EE02.9070007@adrenaline.com> <4243EEBC.4000504@adrenaline.com> <02bb01c53150$47137790$1ae76c18@ted> <42445492.8050003@adrenaline.com>
I paid $100 for my Summi-Jupiter10-lux.
If I pull on the aperture ring I can actually make the front portion
of the lens turn like a PC lens.
Well worth the money.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:12:34 -0500, Scott McLoughlin
<scott@adrenaline.com> wrote:
> You know, I've never considerd the legendary Noctilux. Maybe
> I should. Pricey though, yes?
>
> Scott
>
In reply to:
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Seeking a new 50)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) (Or the Zeiss Planar - Re: [Leica] Seeking a new 50)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) (Or the Zeiss Planar - Re: [Leica] Seeking a new 50)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) (Or the Zeiss Planar - Re: [Leica] Seeking a new 50)