Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Folks: I've noticed an interesting phenomenon with my E-1 and fast OM Zuiko lenses, and I'm curious if something similar happens with RF lenses on the RD-1. The widest apertures don't give me as much light on the E-1 as they do on film. My 50/1.4 is more like a 50/1.8 wide open. My 50/1.8 is more like a 50/2. Note that I'm not talking about metering error here, nor am I talking about vignetting at the edges. I'm talking about using my 50/1.4 to take a bunch of bracketed shots of a blank wall with manual exposure. If I get a pixel level of 128 near the image center at 1/30 at f/2.8, then I would expect to get the same level at 1/125 at f/1.4. But I don't. I need to slow the shutter to 1/80 to get the same shade of grey. This is 2/3 of a stop more exposure than expected. The same lens shows less than 1/3 stop loss with film. I'm curious if the RD-1 has a similar effect with f/2 and especially f/1.4 lenses. Could some of you RD-1 owners who have Summiluxes and Noktons check this out and let us know? I'm sure all this has to do with sensor angle of acceptance vs. lens characteristics like exit pupil size and angle of the cone of light. There has been some talk of this on digicam forums, with the usual indistinguishable combination of heat and light. I personally believe that something is indeed going on. I've seen too many examples of weird DSLR behavior with film lenses at maximum and minimum apertures. DSLR owners who have used the same fast lens on both a DSLR and film body, feel free to chime in, too. Thanks! --Peter