Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't know ... I'm leaning towards BD on this. Maybe I've just seen them on almanacs too much. I doubt that the powers that be care much one way or another if the environment/wilderness gets preserved. They won't mind, as long as there's no oil in it. His pictures haven't really had much influence now-a-days on that. I get the feeling that those in power regard such questions as sissy concerns. Nothing for real men. Daniel On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, dnygr wrote: > Even if Ansel Adams hadn't done all those technical things you righty > credit him for, he would still be revered for his focus on the > environment/wilderness and its need to be preserved. > > His photos have as much social menaing as the moving pictures of people > during the Great Depression. That aspect of him gets lost through the > commerializiton of his work. > > Doug Nygren