Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RE: was Multiple Bodies, now cropping-phooey!
From: masonster at gmail.com (David Mason)
Date: Sun Mar 6 15:36:51 2005
References: <1e5.3737cae4.2f5c8485@aol.com> <017301c5227c$ab768ed0$6501a8c0@ccapr.com> <6.1.2.0.2.20050306161242.037ee3b8@mail.comporium.net> <6.2.0.14.2.20050306150837.0af8d158@mail.brick.org>

OK - If I hadn't made enemies before... I probably will now, but here
goes. I simply don't like Ansel Adam's work and never have. Certainly
they are beautiful places and he made great photos of those places but
they do almost nothing for me. I just don't get it, sorry. Plus they
are sooooooo overplayed (which is not his fault of course).

Cheers,

Dave

On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 15:19:15 -0800, JCB <jcb@visualimpressions.com> wrote:

> 
> Yes, like all of Ansel Adams photographs. Straight prints of most of his
> negatives were dismal. I've seen many of them! They required a copious
> amount of darkroom massaging in order to become a finished print. Moonrise
> over Hernandez is a sterling example. One exposure before the whole thing
> disappeared. That negative printed as a blah print. It took a Herculean
> effort on Ansel's part to "create" the print we all love.

Replies: Reply from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] RE: was Multiple Bodies, now cropping-phooey!)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] RE: was Multiple Bodies, now cropping-phooey!)
In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] was Multiple Bodies, now cropping-phooey!)
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] was Multiple Bodies, now cropping-phooey!)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] was Multiple Bodies, now cropping-phooey!)
Message from jcb at visualimpressions.com (JCB) ([Leica] RE: was Multiple Bodies, now cropping-phooey!)