Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Tri X @ASA800...
From: paul at paulhardycarter.com (Paul)
Date: Sat Mar 5 04:13:00 2005
References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050305021503.059a5490@192.168.100.42> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0503051132480.10471@hedvig.uio.no>
 
I don't understand why you would say that Daniel. The point of push 
processing is that you can move the value range of the film so that 
lighter areas of the neg get more detail. I assure you that you can 
increase the shadow detail by push processing.

The contrast generally increases too, of course, but again this depends 
on your choice of developer and dilution.

P.

*******
Paul Hardy Carter
www.paulhardycarter.com
*******

On 5 Mar 2005, at 11:36, Daniel Ridings wrote:
>
> If you're concerned about shadow detail, then doing it one way or the
> other (no adjustment or increased development) is going to make no
> difference. Lost shadow detail from underexposure is lost. There's 
> nothing
> a developer can do about it.
Replies: Reply from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Tri X @ASA800...)
 In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Tri X @ASA800...)
Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Tri X @ASA800...)