Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Alastair, you state my sentiments exactly..However, I give BD credit for breaking his own tenets to produce a very fine "street shot". He showed us a shot he took while driving in heavy traffic, I believe in NY, of a "girl talking on a cell phone". It was a very nice shot, well exposed, well focused and a nice composition. What made it an outstanding shot was that the girl was Sarah Jessica Parker. ;-) Regards, Paul Connet In a message dated 2/26/2005 4:08:15 PM Pacific Standard Time, firkin@ncable.net.au writes: <<I know its very easy to be critical of others when they make blanket statements, but "street photography' does NOT "have" to contain anything at all really. Teachers and "academys" tend to insist on making classifications, and then the real "artists" often make fools of them. To insist that to be a landscape a photograph must contain a tree would be stupid. To explain why some street photographers are better than others using terms like "irony, humour and pathos" is fine, but not every image, or even great image taken as "street photography" need contain one of these 3 elements. How about pure horror? Having said that -- I just hate blanket statements --, I have to agree in general with the sentiments expressed. No form of art/craft is easy when it is performed at the highest level. Cheers>>