Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] further trouble in the R-D1 paradise...
From: dennis at hale-pohaku.com (Dennis Painter)
Date: Mon Feb 21 22:39:39 2005
References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050221221023.120bce78@192.168.100.42> <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNOECCBGAB.red735i@earthlink.net> <4dccee3d0502212230203c5277@mail.gmail.com>
 
Thanks, I should have said that also. It *is* relevant to me also! In fact 
Leica's
digital M should be no more than that. I also think it could be priced at 
that
point but now I doubt it will ever happen.

Dennis

David Mason wrote:

> Damn, $3000 is very relevant to me! ;)
In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] further trouble in the R-D1 paradise...)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] further trouble in the R-D1 paradise...)
Message from masonster at gmail.com (David Mason) ([Leica] further trouble in the R-D1 paradise...)