[Leica] A question for Ted, our God of Speed.

[tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)]

Howdy Chris,
Seems you're first. ;-)

> Ted, here's my question. If you have or use an M-series 135mm lens, which 
> one is it? Why that particular lens? Does it hold up well when thumping 
> dullards who get in your way? <<<

I had a 135mm M lens for one assignment back in the '70's because I required 
to be as quiet as possible and yet have some reach, so it was the 135 
Elmarit-m 2.8.  Hated the lens everytime I had it in hand and to my eye! 
Simply because 135 is too long for the M body and viewfinder viewing. And 
that's whatever model Leica make new or old. As soon as the shoot was over 
in a month I sold it at a loss just to get rid of it.

The longest M lens I use is a 90 Summicron  f 2.0, a razor blade sharp 
negative cutter. However, I rarely use it unless I absolutely have to. I 
prefer anything longer than 50mm to be on an R body of some kind. If for 
some reason I required a 135 for the M today I'd look for a used same old 
135 Elmarit-m 2.8. Why? Because it's faster than the new Apo-telyt M f 3.4 
and my first choice for any lens is fast first. Regardless of any other 
number or technical factors.

And yes the 135 Elmarit-m 2.8. is solidly made and a good thumping lens if 
necessary. ;-) Although I'd not recommend lens thumping. ;-)

I hope this answer works for you,
regards,
ted