Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/02/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] FLUG
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Sun Feb 20 14:06:19 2005
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20050220124909.05051250@postoffice.worldnet.att.net> <000301c5177d$4fd3f950$833b6d18@ted> <6.1.0.6.2.20050220133651.12070660@192.168.100.42> <004901c51797$5652ba90$833b6d18@ted>
I know I know. Can't resist :-)
I am betting that your lens philosophy is that....
Does it cut a good sharp image? If so, it's a good lens.
:-)
At 01:58 PM 2/20/2005, Ted Grant wrote:
>Hi Richard,
>Honestly my original post on this topic was a complete tongue in cheek
>regarding William G. Lamb, III's post on more or all Leica conversation!
>Sorry for putting you to the trouble of posting some interesting points.
// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please
use richard at imagecraft.com)
Replies:
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] WAS: FLUG. NOW: LENS SHARP. ;-))
In reply to:
Message from lambroving at worldnet.att.net (William G. Lamb, III) ([Leica] FLUG)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] FLUG)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] FLUG)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] FLUG)