Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted: I agree that the LUG buying out Leica is whimsical fantasy (and I think the original poster intended it as such). And you're right, there are plenty of used Leicas and lenses around. But still, Leica's troubles make me sad. The Leica has a place in my identity as a photographer. I've never found a camera that suits me as well as a Leica M. So if it can't be made any more, that leaves a void. Not in my ability to photograph, but in my gut. If they go under completely, I wonder whether others will truly fill the niche, or whether the guys with spreadsheets will use it to "prove" that there just isn't a market for RFs anymore. The prospect of Leica going away gives me that same feeling that I get when a TV show I like is cancelled because it doesn't appeal to junior-high school boys. Or when I can't get decent clothes in my size because I'm not "average." Or when a well-made product is driven out of the market by cheaper junk. Leica is one of the few things left in the world that give the aura of "best possible" rather than "good enough," or "not quite bad enough for the chumps to send it back." It saddens me that a Leica may not be not viable in the current world. DSLRs may be amazing, but they ain't the same, and they cost a lot for something that will be obsolete next month. Finally, it pains me to see the glee at which some folks here quote market economics as if it were Holy Scripture, to justify the demise of Leica. The Market may promote efficiency, but it does not necessarily promote quality, and it can be, excuse me, a bitch goddess. I'm reminded of Churchill's comment about democracy--it's the worst form of government there is, except for all the others. :-) And, yes, I am aware of the shortsightedness and mistakes Leica has made. Still, I hope they can dig themselves out of this hole somehow. Or that somebody buys Leica and keeps it going-- the actual company, not just the name as in Voigtlander. --Peter At 11:31 PM 2/18/05 -0800, Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca>: >But Scott if you already own one, a Leica M of some kind or several, and >there's thousands of M's floating about the world for at least the next 40 >years, who the hell cares if the mother company goes belly up? All this >whining, hand wringing by others, save the company buy a bunch of cameras >crap is rediculous for a company that's been dragging it's ass back in the >30's, '40's & 50's when it was the greatest. I can't believe some of the >silly concerns it's almost like if they crash and burn every owner in the >world will die immediately with them? Nonsense!