Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bob Unfortunately, Leica actually even has no money for R&D for a Digilux 3, so with what money should they develop a new DSLR or digi-M. How much time and money do you think Nikon and Canon needed do develop their DSLR line-ups? More than Leica earns in seven years. You cannot produce a Nikon D70 or a Canon 20d without having developped the top-of-the-line model first. I see four options for Leica: - Leica is bought by Panasonic, keeps the analog line, but digitally seen, joins the 4/3 train with new lenses and bodies, giving up DMR and digital M plans, and produces hi-end lenses for for the 4/3 market - Leica is bought by Konica-Minolta, keeps the analog line, keeps DMR and digi-M plans with the technology from K-M, and produces hi-end lenses for K-M bodies - If no buyer comes in, Leica is, as Philippe proposed, cut down to a specialty maintenance and repair shop for exisiting cameras and lenses, and an on demand production shop - Or, worst case, Leica goes bancrupt Didier >Leica has that opportunity by producing a digital M 35mm format and a DSLR >that can compete with the D70. Then they could sell their non pareil >lenses to really make profit. >Bob