Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica-Olympus-Panasonic-Nikon-Canon, yikes!
From: lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda)
Date: Thu Feb 17 04:00:02 2005
References: <000001c511e0$29fc6340$6501a8c0@dorysrusp4> <960483ad1f63d63a1a330fd1c51d6745@earthlink.net> <p06001033be35b61cfdbc@gpsy.com>

On 14 de feb de 2005, at 3:05, Karen Nakamura wrote:

> The Olympus is unfortunately not in the top-five but Pentax is doing 
> surprisingly well.

Almost nobody running a real bussiness will spend these huge amounts of 
money every year for a [little] couple of goods while most clients are 
happy with the 5-6mpx output of their yet-new/deadly-obsolete killer 
camera of yesterday's evening.

Computers have already passed this stage, and most bussines renovates 
their hardware in a 3-5 years cycle. Minolta and Pentax are raising 
their first serious models, and now are exploiting their user base, 
most others brand have done it already, so...





Saludos
-----------------------------------------
http://imaginarymagnitude.net/blog/


In reply to: Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Interview re. Leica-Olympus-Panasonic manage)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Interview re. Leica-Olympus-Panasonic manage)
Message from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] Leica-Olympus-Panasonic-Nikon-Canon, yikes!)