Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Which 35mm 'cron or 'lux?
From: tarek.charara at pix-that-stimulate.com (Tarek Charara)
Date: Thu Feb 10 13:46:53 2005
References: <54ef94574f020d55cf2a671fe25042e1@comcast.net> <6.2.1.2.2.20050210223647.048183d0@mail.screengang.com>
 
Take the fastest lenses you can afford, you'll probably never regret it!

Tarek

Le 10 f?vr. 2005, ? 22:39, Didier Ludwig a ?crit :

> It's still an extra stop more, if you use the same emulsions with a 
> 'lux'!
>
> Myself, I went for a 'lux' (75mm, a 'cron' (50mm) and a Voigtlander 
> Ultron (35mm).
> Didier
>
>
>> With modern emulsions, TMY, TMZ, Portra 800, is the extra stop of the 
>> Summilux worth the weight and added cost?
>> I love the results with my 50 and 90 Summicron's and am trying to 
>> decide which 35mm to round out my bag.
Replies: Reply from isakuhiga at hotmail.com (Higa Isaku) ([Leica] Which 35mm 'cron or 'lux?)
 In reply to: Message from carlmuck at comcast.net (Carl Muckenhirn) ([Leica] Which 35mm 'cron or 'lux?)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Which 35mm 'cron or 'lux?)