Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Frank, One of many things you and I have others may not understand by our comments on the surface... "we understand each other without folks realizing it." Where they may take it that you or I are "snapping? sniping? at each other" it's our way of understanding neither means a personal attack. ted ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2005 8:42 AM Subject: RE: [Leica] 75 'cron now 105 F1.4 WHATEVER! > Ted.. we live in 2 worlds..... The ART world where nothing is > quantifiable, > also called the world of marekting where we get to be convinced of thinsg > that simply are not true, using "facts": and the scientific world where > real hard quantifiable data is used to establish "facts". > > I have said before that it is your art. You get to make the last word on > what is good enough, or not. > > Testing, etc is a way to convince others that a specific point is valid, > and > in so doing, get a person to buy something. People make decisions based > upon "facts". Debunking them is hard, because facts are technical and few > users can understand the technicalities. Markleteers make it easy to > swallow their "facts". "Facts" bounce all over the LUG. Some are true, > some are bunk. > > The bottom line is whatever works is OK, but donl;t try to convice me that > your opinion is something I should run to embrace. Especially when your > opinion is based upon misunderstood "facts" made by others. Let's be > clear > on what is subjective and what is objective. > > None of this is worded at Ted, nor his opinions. It is directed to get > people to at least question the source and methodology of the "facts" they > intend to use to make a buying decision. > > Now off to do what Ted has said....the TAKE PICTURES part.<<<<<<<<