Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: M Studio Use
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Tue Feb 1 18:50:33 2005
References: <00dd01c507c0$639b3b00$6401a8c0@ccapr.com> <41FEA424.10806@adrenaline.com> <000601c507e7$95181370$82f7fea9@D1WTYD41> <2147483647.1107183921@scarborough.isc.org> <41FF4128.6000307@adrenaline.com> <ec54b8adccba9411372033dcd094dc10@shaw.ca> <6.1.0.6.2.20050201140033.05a46e88@192.168.100.42> <5262392039772e6c881ef80ede14eeff@shaw.ca>
 
Thanks John, I learn so much from this list!



On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:19:03 -0700, John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> wrote:
> Some older flashes and studio flashes have very high sync voltages --
> sometimes 300+ volts. This can be more than a bit much for the
> microprocessor triggering the flash in the M6TTL and the M7 (and other
> cameras as well). It can easily fry the camera's electronics. It is
> simple to use a voltmeter to check the voltage across a fully charged
> flash.
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] What is the best non ttl flash to use?)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) (M Studio Use - was: Re: [Leica] What is the best non ttl flash to use?)
Message from wharting at verizon.net (bill harting) ([Leica] Re: M Studio Use)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Re: M Studio Use)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re: M Studio Use)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Re: M Studio Use)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Re: M Studio Use)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Re: M Studio Use)