Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Of all the photos I took, there were a few rolls of our kidz taken when they were young about 8 years on Kodak Gold 200. I wish I have taken them with a different film, the grain was the size of golf balls :-( The kidz were that young only once. There is a large dose of truth in you never heard someone says, "Hey that picture looks pretty good, did you try to use a cheaper (camera/lens/film/processing)?" At 08:36 PM 1/31/2005, Chandos Michael Brown wrote: >Kodak Gold, for all its virtues, is still a crummy film. You're >shooting with the best optics that modern 35mm film technology affords. >Why not use the best emulsions available? Even allowing for the >vagaries of web transmission, the color balance is off here, the dynamic >range limited, and what might have been an engaging image is overwhelmed >by the mediocrity of its reproduction. // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com)