Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The new Tri-X, 400TX, got even better: http://www.phototechmag.com/previous-articles/2003/ma-dikerson/dickerson.html or (if that gets broken) http://tinyurl.com/69rkr My own experience confirms what is written here. One of the authors was behind the creation of Xtol. Daniel On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 nathan.wajsman@planet.nl wrote: > Hi Ruben, > > In my opinion, for 400 and even 800, nothing beats Tri-X developed in > XTOL for overall tonality and grain. You will have more grain than with > the slow films no matter what, but it will certainly not be > objectionable. If you look at my PAWs from 2003 and first half of 2004, > you will find lots of Tri-X images. > > Cheers, > Nathan