Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B.D. said: While Leica acquiring is a disease for some, I would guess - just as you have guessed - that most Leica owners have a single body and own, at absolute most, three lenses; I'd guess most owners have one or two. Actually, that has not been my experience at all with living people. Yes, when someone asks about Uncle Ned's old camera he brought back from Germany, they are only talking about a single camera/lens. However, I could go on for a very long time about individuals that I thought on the surface were normal seeming but have quite a few Leicas stashed away. Perhaps it is a southern thing and the more frugal NEasters only have a body and a lens or two. What is more interesting, is that these individuals have no interest in selling their cameras or lenses. The proverbial story about the SL2 losing so much money that Leica needed to sell three lenses with every body to break even could have an interesting twist. There are a whole bunch of old bodies that might need new lenses. C/V has proved that a modest price point we will buy a few lenses just to try out. If Leica could ever sort out their production and both fill demand and lower cost then they might sell more items. I guess I am suggesting that some production move to a lower cost of business location. Lower price, more product sold, less cost per item to amortize R&D, lower price yet. Back to my original rant err slant, if I did a survey of all the non LUG or LHSA people I know who own and use Leica's, it would probably come out to three bodies and seven lenses as an average. The actual break out would include a LTM, and two M's or alternately an SL, R, and a P&S. In other words, a wide assortment of camera's purchased over the years. Don dorysrus@mindspring.com