Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jan 22, 2005, at 1:11 AM, Daniel Ridings wrote: > To my knowledge, if you read my post, I said "take a fantastic lens". > > I doubt very very seriously that the pro lenses (= fantastic lenses) > from > Canon are chicken shit. Anyone who says they are is reacting more from > their religious convictions rather than aesthetic experiences. > > Daniel I didn't say that the Canon lenses were crap, as a matter of fact Canon makes some very, very good lenses. I said that post processing an image will only get you so far. You can correct all kinds of things to a certain extend, but in the end post processing is a band aid and so substitute for a high quality capture. Garbage in = garbage out. You can't make up information that isn't in the negative and you can only correct things like softness, blooming etc to a certain point. Trust me, I've had to attempt to fix such things at my job, thousands of times more than I care to admit. feli ________________________________________________________ feli2@earthlink.net 2 + 2 = 4 www.elanphotos.com