Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x
From: sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner)
Date: Sat Jan 22 07:51:19 2005
References: <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNOEPCBBAB.red735i@earthlink.net> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0501220604220.20612@hedvig.uio.no> <026501c50040$f6d24710$24a0fea9@MacPhisto> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0501220619500.20612@hedvig.uio.no> <331CB557-6C53-11D9-90AC-000D933F4332@earthlink.net> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0501221059460.27394@hedvig.uio.no>
Daniel Ridings wrote:
> My point is that consumer glass has reached the standards of Leica
> glass from years back. Actually, it has surpassed it.
Daniel, forgive my bluntness: utter rubbish. Such a statement tends to
disqualify everything you write.
Seth
Replies:
Reply from phong at doan-ltd.com (Phong) ([Leica] Re: Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
In reply to:
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Re: Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Re: Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)
Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Re: Doomed: Leica MP 0.58x)