Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Phong writes: > On a related topic, I would greatly appreciate it if you (Frank, > Bob or anybody else who uses the Canon 1Ds Mk2, and 1D Mk2) > could report on the low light / high ISO performances of these > 2 cameras, compared to say the Canon 10D/20D with which I am > familar. There may still be some R lenses in my future. :-) I can only compare the 10D and 1DMk2. In my experience, the 1DMk2 has noticeably better low light / high ISO performance...but I believe that is to be expected given the larger sensor size and somewhat newer technology. I don't believe you can really tell much from images sized for the web, but having said that, here are some recent photos of a delivery (warning: DOG PHOTOS) taken with the 1DMk2 and Canon 28mm 1.8 at very high ISO (1600 and 3200): http://www.bobbaron.com/BirdiePupsNov04/page1.html I can't immediately find any really low light shots made with the 10D but my experience generally is that it does not have the dynamic range of the 1DMk2. Of course, it is/was about 1/3 the price. Finally, obligatory Leica content: I do a lot of photos of our dogs, and I really need (at my age and with my eyesight and reflexes) the autofocus feature. However, if things are moving as slowly as I do, I really like the Leica R 80 on a Canon digital body. Tina Manley was kind enough to let me fondle her 80 affixed to a 20D at the Park Square seminar and it is just plain wonderful. Hope this helps. --Bob