Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Nikon D2h
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Mon Jan 3 08:01:34 2005
References: <004801c4f1a7$0305f110$6401a8c0@ccapr.com>

So, you're telling me that if I print an 16x20 from a 5mp and a 16x20 from a
4mp, you can tell the difference? Some D2h images look better than my D100
6mp images.

I can't so you are better than me if you can.

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "B. D. Colen"Subject: RE: [Leica] Re:OT Nikon D2h


> There is indeed a difference, Chris, and I say this primarily using a
> 5mgp DSLR - The difference can be seen when you enlarge the image on the
> screen to 100%, and the difference can be seeing and painfully felt in
> terms of limiting the ability to crop and still get a quality print. I
> am seeing it now in the difference in file size between the 5 mgp
> Olympus E-1 and the 8 mgp Evolt prosumer body. I prefer the E-1 for any
> number of reasons, but I lust for a new version with an 8 to 10 mgp
> sensor.
>
> B. D.



Replies: Reply from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Re: Nikon D2h)
Reply from hans.pahlen at telia.com (Hans Pahlen) ([Leica] Re: Nikon D2h)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Re:OT Nikon D2h)