Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:OT Nikon D2h
From: feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli di Giorgio)
Date: Sun Jan 2 21:46:41 2005
References: <000001c4f051$85b84600$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4><04965E96-5C4F-11D9-BE6B-000D932F570E@mac.com><6.1.0.6.2.20050101155107.05a70bc0@192.168.100.42><007201c4f150$3cf71540$24a0fea9@MacPhisto> <3881FD4C-5D49-11D9-B1E0-00306599C552@earthlink.net> <01b301c4f156$a0c25bb0$24a0fea9@MacPhisto>

On Jan 2, 2005, at 9:39 PM, Christopher Williams wrote:

> Believe me, I find no difference in quality from 4mp to 6mp dSLR's.
>

It's a very clean 4MP below 800, color balance is terrific, but there 
is no extra resolution to crop and I don't think I would want to print 
it any bigger than 8x10.


>  Noisy, okay after 800iso but what film is not?

Well, one of the advantages of going digital is supposed to be cleaner 
high iso shots.

> Would you like a clean 1600iso film?

Who wouldn't?


> If(IF) Nikon ever gets the D2x out, we may see a D2hhi or whatever.

Lets hope. I really like Nikons.


>
> The D2h is a steal at $1999.

Not so sure. The D20 is only $400 bucks less...
It's not as fast as the D2h, but still...

Feli

> Chris

_______________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                    2 + 2 = 4                     
www.elanphotos.com



Replies: Reply from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:OT Nikon D2h)
In reply to: Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Intro)
Message from driggett at mac.com (Christopher Driggett) ([Leica] Intro)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Intro)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Intro)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Intro)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:OT Nikon D2h)