Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Rangefinder Basics
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Sat Jan 1 17:19:28 2005
References: <BAY101-F24C6EF1E3BB41F60C9C1B6CE9F0@phx.gbl> <6.1.0.6.2.20050101170229.05aafe48@192.168.100.42> <76ba89b3050101171448989417@mail.gmail.com>
 
I hate to nitpick, but half a stop faster (if that) is not MUCH faster :-)

Great pic!

At 05:14 PM 1/1/2005, Jeffery Smith wrote:

>Let me enthusiastically support the notion of not using a flash. And
>your timing is very good, in that the 40/1.4 that has just come out is
>fast and cheap and good. If you can go higher than that, the CV 35/1.2
>is much faster (but much bigger and costs twice as much). Sonny shot
>this using mine and 400 ISO Kodak T400CN.
>
>http://www.sonc.com/jeff_and_kid.htm

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard at imagecraft.com)
Replies: Reply from jefferys at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Rangefinder Basics)
 In reply to: Message from mikezx18 at hotmail.com (mike zx18) ([Leica] Rangefinder Basics)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Rangefinder Basics)
Message from jefferys at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Rangefinder Basics)