Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dear Colleagues, I think Sontag gave photography too much credit -- we regard it as blame -- for how our society sees itself and creates itself in some image she doesn't like and thinks is unhealthy. I don't think she blames photographers for that. She thought that capitalist system that parlays sex, luxury, etc. was its cause and is promoted by the photographic image. That the photographer is an unwitting part of the system. It's the images she saw that affected her that way at a certain moment in her life. As a critical observer she ran with that idea. In a later book she reversed a lot of her thinking in On Photography. The world had changed and so did she. However, that psychological and sociological case she makes against the commercial photographic image in the US and the nature of still photography isn't the whole story and it wasn't what I was looking for in Sontag's work. There is a sideband in On Photography that has nothing to do with the critical theme although Sontag thinks that it is part of her critical context. For example, here are a few quotes I underlined from On Photography: "The less doctored, the less patently crafted, the more naive -- the more authoritative the photograph is likely to be." "What renders a photograph surreal is its irrefutable pathos as a message from time past, and the concreteness of its intimations about social class." "Life is not about significant details, illuminated a flash, fixed forever. Photographs are." [That's something to think about. Do photographers transfigure the world. Are we aware of what we're doing? Or is Susan wrong? That's mindstretching.] "Indeed, the very extent to which that photograph [Che Guevara's body laid out on a stretcher in the presence of the Bolivian military and a US intelligence agent] is unforgettable indicates its potential for being depoliticized, for becoming a timeless image." "Cartier-Bresson has likened himself to a Zen archer, who must become the target so as to be able to hit it; "'thinking should be done before and afterwards," he says, "'never while actually taking the photograph.'" "Benjamin thought that a photograph, being a mechanically reproduced object, could not have genuine presence. It could be argued, however, that the very situation .... has revealed that photographs do possess a kind of authenticity." Sontag quotes Nietzsche: To experience a thing as beautiful means to experience it necessarily wrongly. Sontag is alluding to -- I think incorrectly -- to the effect that certain photos have in sanitizing an ugly reality by giving it an esthetic composition, which a competent photographer instinctively does. Hey, photographers are thinking human beings. And that's what Sontag is all about, whether she's right or wrong. She prods us to think! So I mourn her passing, as I would any hardworking writer who has something to say and who does her/his preparation well and respects her/his readers. Bob