Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/12/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Kyle's latest schlock: Is it stupid? Is it fabulous?
From: KCassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy)
Date: Thu Dec 16 06:27:18 2004
You be the judge.
Should kyle get back to goth grrlz in PVC dresses? Should he keep working on
this? Should he link it to his portfolio page? Should he stop talking about
himself in the third person?
http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/cassidy/pix/portfolio/found2/
Keep pushing that shutter button, it'll come unstuck.
Kc
Replies:
Reply from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Kyle's latest schlock: Is it stupid? Is it fabulous?)
Reply from cmbrow at wm.edu (Chandos Michael Brown) ([Leica] Kyle's latest schlock: Is it stupid? Is it fabulous?)
Reply from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Kyle's latest schlock: Is it stupid? Is it fabulous?)
Reply from clifwrightphotos at yahoo.com (Clif Wright) ([Leica] Kyle's latest schlock: Is it stupid? Is it fabulous?)
Reply from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Kyle's latest schlock: Is it stupid? Is it fabulous?)
Reply from dennis at hale-pohaku.com (Dennis Painter) ([Leica] Kyle's latest schlock: Is it stupid? Is it fabulous?)
Reply from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Re: Kyle's latest schlock: Is it stupid? Is it fabulous?)
Reply from hartzell at kestrel.alerce.com (George Hartzell) ([Leica] Kyle's latest schlock: Is it stupid? Is it fabulous?)
Reply from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Kyle's latest schlock: Is it stupid? Is it fabulous?)
Reply from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Kyle's latest schlock: Is it stupid? Is it fabulous?)