Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]a few years ago I bought a Canon S900 at the time it was a best rated printer, and Canon claimed a print life of 25 years Canon lied. prints were badly faded within 6 months indoors, with no exposure to sunlight, using Canon inks and the best Canon papers. it's easy to get excited about digital's ease it's also far to easy to forget about how long the digital image we worked so hard for will be around. digital prints aren't proven to last as long as silver, regardless of any claims made otherwise, cause digital prints and storage mediums ain't a hundred years old yet ! buyers of art prints have a right to expect their investment to be protected not only during their lifetime, but during their survivor's lifetime as well. anything less is unacceptable. but forget them. Photographers have the right to expect their work will last during our lifetime, and beyond for their families after they pass over. real world, digital work may not do that at its present state of development. sure, it will eventually happen, but that will be of little consequence to those who lose years of work, or even entire careers, due to digital degradation of prints and storage mediums. the only way I know of to really safeguard that valued digital print is to make a silver neg copy of the digital print. in silver I trust the future, not digital. someday maybe, but not now. I am open to other solutions, but I won't believe unproved claims of estimated life spans of digital prints and digital storage mediums. Stephen Gandy