Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/12/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2
From: jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier)
Date: Sun Dec 5 11:42:19 2004
References: <200412051050.iB5Am3BV033539@server1.waverley.reid.org> <002b01c4dad8$5867df50$a752d553@mendigain> <02A06116-46F4-11D9-9B6B-003065B7587A@interlink.es>
Sure, underwater.
John Collier
On Dec 5, 2004, at 12:29 PM, Luis Miguel Casta?eda wrote:
> On 5 de dic de 2004, at 15:40, F?lix L?pez de Maturana wrote:
>
>> Same thoughts Dave! I've used two Nikons,
>
> I didnt like any 28 for SLR Nikon, but 28mm for the nikonos its
> wonderful.
Replies:
Reply from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] Re: Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2)
In reply to:
Message from fmaturana at euskalnet.net (Félix López de Maturana) ([Leica] Re: Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2)
Message from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] Re: Canon 28 vs. Konica 28 vs Voigtlander 2)