Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] digital R question
From: feli2 at earthlink.net (feli)
Date: Wed Nov 24 16:10:25 2004
References: <04d001c4d257$f9849560$6401a8c0@ccapr.com>

On Nov 24, 2004, at 11:01 AM, B. D. Colen wrote:

> Come on, Feli - Baby steps in 1999, perhaps, but in 2004 these look 
> like
> badly crippled geriatric steps. ;-)

Yes B.D. Baby steps for a company that has so far only produced analog 
gear.
Are you seriously expecting Leica to leapfrog Canon el all? By Leica 
standards this is a
big step.

But frankly I don't think there is anything they could do to satisfy 
you, short of coming out
with something as advanced as a 1ds II. And then you would probably 
complain that they
merely matched the competition, instead of leapfrogging them. You 
obviously think they are a bunch of idiots and are waiting for them to 
fall flat on their face so you can say "told you so."

Feli


________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                     2 + 2 = 4                      
www.elanphotos.com


Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] digital R question)
Reply from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] digital R question)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] digital R question)