Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]F?lix L?pez de Maturana offered: >> Do test the Canon 10-22 zoom. I did in the Photokina > and coming back home, always I carry a Compact flash for tests, I was > surprised of the lack of distortion and sharpness of this zoom that makes > a 135 16-35 equivalent.<<<<< Hi Felix, I wasn't as bright as you and take a flash card along with me when I had a look at the 20D this afternoon. However, I did have a look at a couple of zoom lenses and in particular the one you mentioned."10--22!" Now that's the kind of view I like to work with. I mean at 16 to 35 it's a very nice range and looked great through the 20D viewfinder even in the brightly lit photo store. Actually I hate looking through any camera in the store. Better to go outside and have a look in the real world of daylight, some how always seems to be a better light to judge the lens and viewfinder . Unfortunately it was pouring rain! :-( But like I said, the 10 is my kind of view when doing travel shooting with beautiful blue seas and puffy white clouds. :-) And with the Canon-Leica adapter the three Leica zoom lenses I have might be rather interesting also. Even though they wont be the identical focal lengths as shown for a full frame film. So I'm edging closer to the 20D and a lens, although I think I'll wait for the camera and adapter in hand before I spring beyond the camera and 10-22 zoom lens for the moment. ted