Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled
From: firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Tue Nov 23 04:15:16 2004
References: <023001c4d0a4$c584b880$6401a8c0@ccapr.com>

So BD, if you disagree with Ted, what's your call on the issue?

Cheers


On 23/11/2004, at 2:05 AM, B. D. Colen wrote:

> Much as it pains me, Ted, I have to disagree on this one. If we were
> talking about silver prints v. quadtone inkjet prints, then, yes, the
> beauty is in the eye of the beholder. But the question of whether a 
> file
> from a 10mgp digital camera can equal the same image, exposed the same
> way, shot the same way, on film, can be measured objectively in terms 
> of
> dynamic range, "Micro detail," contrast, etc. etc.
>
> B. D.


Alastair


In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled)