Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The last time I used a real darkroom was when I was in HS doing B&W literally in the apartment's bathroom. I was really happy that a few years ago I got a scanner, inkjet printer and photoshop, and after a couple years of fighting with color management, I am getting decent prints from the system. All these times, setting up a wet darkroom isn't even under consideration because there just isn't enough space in the garage. Last year I got the Jobo CPE-2 and now I am shooting 99% slides, and I scan the slides in with the rest of the workflow pretty much the same as if I start with digital capture Anyway, our water heater died a few weeks ago, and we replaced it with a tankless on demand system. Meaning that all of a sudden there are some space in the garage!! If nothing else, now I can have the Jobo on its own table and not share it with the tools workbench. However, I am wondering if I should move another step and get a wet darkroom setup. I can't imagine doing colors would be much fun, but how about B&W? I tried 2 rolls of TMax last year and got some chemicals to develop the film with the Jobo. However, I think to get them to scan in as simple and as easy as the slides would take a lot more disciplines on my part. With the LS-4000, I just turn on ICE and the dust would not show up on the slide scans. B&W doesn't have the extra layer so I cannot use ICE. How many people are still printing their B&W using a wet darkroom? I understand the look of wet printed B&W is very different from the inkjet printed B&W, so any particular strong reasons to do wet prints any more? The used enlarger must be fairly cheap now? Don't Leica make some B&W enlarger too? I know I will have to remove dust and all that by hand. I am thinking that I can develop the film by hand as the Jobo probably isn't helping much there but using the Jobo to develop the prints. Anyone has experience with that? // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com)