Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark, I'm not sure you are the proper person to be criticising the bokeh boys. I just spent a nice 20 minutes surveying your web site, and it is pretty obvious why bokeh means nothing to you. You are shooting fashion or comercial work with little in the way of background. The background is either non-existant or pretty much "in-focus", (f8 type stuff) even in your outdoor shots. Shoot something at f1.4 or f2 or even f2.8 with a close, busy background and then lets discuss the effect of bokeh on the overall photograph. Me, I shoot with old, (read cheap) glass and don't worry about bokeh either. If it is there and bad, I crop it out or take it out with the computer. ;-) By the way, I do think you are a very accomp;lished photographer, and consider you to be a gereral delight on the LUG. Regards, Paul Connet <<In a message dated 11/18/2004 3:13:32 PM Pacific Standard Time, mark@rabinergroup.com writes: <<I'm with Ted Grant whose position has always been I'm pretty sure that a shot is more about what's IN focus than what's OUT of focus. This would or should sound obvious but the way half these guys on the list talk about glass it would seem to me mainly about Bokeh. I think there is a real Gestalt crisis going on. Things have gotten more yang yin than yin yang. Be it Bokeh could be the coolest revelation since sliced bread about what we peons can understand about the whole voodoo of lens design but lets get real here. Lets get focused. I'm just not with many of my friends on list and else ware who feel there is some negative hard edged Bokeh or elsewise thing about the newest ASPH designs. I never met an ASPH I didn't like! And DO feel I know an ASPH from a hole in the ground.>>