Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: m4-2 #
From: raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K)
Date: Fri Nov 19 08:42:37 2004
References: <BAY14-F91EB70E5D07E59340DE05B2C30@phx.gbl> <AE2106B7-3A30-11D9-97BC-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>

Could you elaborate: what was wrong with it?
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Collier" <jbcollier@shaw.ca>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: m4-2 #


> There is no specific serial number where we can say under this bad and 
> over this good. Generally the early batches are suspect though there 
> are some good cameras in there. Anything above 1 5xx xxx should be 
> fine. I had a late M4-2 (153xxxx) and it was a great camera. I sold it 
> to finance my first TTL. I subsequently bought an early one (148xxxx) 
> partly to see what they were like. What a chump. I paid a good price 
> because it had a fresh CLA from a distributor. I then paid a for a 
> complete overhaul (more expensive than a CLA) at Kindermann and ended 
> up selling it cheap with a warranty. OUCH!
> 
> John Collier
> 

In reply to: Message from alexglissan at hotmail.com (Alexander Glissan) ([Leica] Re: m4-2 #)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Re: m4-2 #)