Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Thu Nov 18 01:13:42 2004
References: <5FE96E80-3904-11D9-A438-000A95C33F68@dodo.com.au> <BDC15E26.1C6AD%telyt@earthlink.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20041117204518.057b4910@192.168.100.42> <6C7E8986-392A-11D9-97F8-00306599C552@earthlink.net>

I don't think that's EXACTLY what he said, but many people have claimed he 
have said similar things. Regardless, I have communicated with him a couple 
times, and at least he himself is reasonable about it, unlike the legions 
of people who use his data as the gospels!

At 10:23 PM 11/17/2004, Feli di Giorgio wrote:
>...
>Didn't Reichmann also believe that the 6MP 10D was better than 35mm and 
>almost
>as good as MF?
>
>I shot a 1Ds (11mp) against my Hasselblad. The Hassy won.

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard at imagecraft.com) 


In reply to: Message from rdcb37 at dodo.com.au (Rick Dykstra) ([Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled)
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Re: Nikon's profits tripled)