Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]When this lens was announced I scoffed at the idea - a $2500 standard 50/1,4! I thought it was a joke, but I was sufficiently intrigued to ask Leica for a loaner at photokina. Big mistake! I have now used it since late September and I have put 60-70 rolls of film through it (Tri-X) and a couple of 100 images in my loaner RD-1. Not only is it a major improvement over the old Summilux (I have 2 of those), it beats the 50/2 hands down. The floating rear element makes a big difference in close shooting (a weak spot with the old version) and its smaller size, compared to the older one, makes it comfortable to hold and carry. Leica also managed to remove some of the unpleasant "Asph" jagged look that the 21/24/35's suffered from. Contrast is higher than the old version (easy to do - they tended to be a bit "flat") but it is not so elevated as to make it difficult to print. The extra stop over the 50/2 is a bonus, but even without that I would still use it as my preferred 50. It might sound like heresy - but it is that good. The pull out/locking hood is an improvement - I have been bugging Leica since the infamous 90/2 of 1980 to come up with that lock (all my "collapsible" hood lenses have holes drilled and tapped in them that locks them in a fully extended position. Oh, you can use gaffer tape too, but the glue residue is tacky (pun intended). What is the result of this test - at LHSA in Williamsburg I asked Stefan Daniel to send me a bill for the lens - I am buying it! Stefan smiled and said "I knew you would". Any negatives? Well, nit-picking I would say that the lock for the hood is a bit too short - it only turns about 1/8's of a turn and occasionally I have found it in my bag with the hood collapsed. A good ? turn would have been better. I am not getting rid of my old DR Summicrons or the nice chrome standard Summicrons - they are the lenses that I have used for 40+ years and sometimes one gets nostalgic and want that "look" - but for regular shooting it is 50/1,4 Asph! I use the 50 about 30% of the time - wider lenses (21/24/28) about 20% of the time and the 35's for the balance. The last month I have been trying to get by with only a 50/35 combo - 35/2 or VC 35/2,5 on a M2 and the 50/1,4 Asph on the MP. Nice "walk-about" package. All the best, Tom A -------------- Tom Abrahamsson Vancouver, BC Canada www.rapidwinder.com