Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Karen, I don't believe it's a good idea to lump all versions of Cosina's rangefinder mechanisms together -- there are differences in the now four generations. the statement about "The R2 that the R-D1 is based on has a fragile RF too" simplifies to the point of being inaccurate as far as I am concerned. On top of that is the question of what is really causing the reported RD-1 focusing problems As I do warranty work on the entire Cosina Voigtlander Bessa series, I can assure you the later R2/R2S/R2C series cameras have considerably less RF alignment problems than Cosina's first combined RF/VF, the Bessa R. Even so, the R remains a bargain to me considering the low closeout price. Oddly enough my personal Leica M6 Titanium classic needs RF alignment annually, but so far my personal Bessa R2 never has need RF adjustment -- go figure. I am just saying the different Cosina made Bessas RF/VF should not be lumped together in terms of durability. The very differently designed Bessa T rangefinder mechanism has also proven durable in service with a minimum of problems. Cosina's new generation of RF/VF found in the Voigtlander R2A & R3A / Epson RD-1 / and upcoming Zeiss Ikon all use a new updated and modified version of the R2 finder. True they are related to the R/R2, but the new designs are significantly different. New RF/VF family improvements include a larger eyepiece ocular for better eye relief and an approximately 50% larger RF patch for easier focusing. Additional family differences are the 1:1 life-size finder in the RD-1 and R3A vs the standard .7 magnification in the R2 and R2A, as well as the long 75mm base length in the upcoming Zeiss Ikon. Knowing Cosina, I am sure internal design improvements over the R2 are likely incorporated in the new designs as well. While troubles have been reported with the Epson RD-1 rangefinder, the new design will probably mean improved RF durability once initial production bugs are worked out. It also needs to be pointed out that the cause of some reported RD-1's focusing errors has not been determined. Is the problem RF adjustment, sensor placement, user error, a combination of the above, or something else? While the new Cosina RF/VF designs are not as good overall as the RF/VFs in today's Leica M rangefinders, the new generation Cosina RF/VF finders come a lot closer than many would expect. My point is that we can't be sure what is causing the reported RD-1 focusing problems without careful tech examination of several such cameras, and that treating all the Cosina Voigtlander RF designs like they are same in terms of design or durability simply does not give an accurate picture ... (OK, so I love photography puns) Stephen Karen Nakamura wrote: > The R2 that the R-D1 is based on has a fragile RF too. They tend to > drift out of calibration if they are handled roughly. You can > recalibrate it yourself if you know how but it's not as simple as the > old Leica screw rangefinders. You have to take the top off. My guess > is that Epson will do this for free during the warrantee period, but > you'd have to take it in. > > Epson should use strong lacquer when gluing down the calibration > screws. It's not like the cameras are broken, but it's definitely a > pain when your RF drifts. > > Karen