Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Luis Ripoll wrote: > I would like read your opinions as said for the 75, a > good replacement for the 50 & 90? Hello Luis, The 50mm is my favorite lens. But if I go out with 2 lenses the 35 Summilux Apsh + 75mm Summilux was my favorite combination. And it makes a formidable system for low-light photography. The only thing I dislike about the 75mm in the Leica M is that it is very easy to forget to frame with the 75mm frame lines and use instead the 50mm frame lines instead. A mistake I kept making when I use the 50mm and 75mm in succession. Also, I find 35mm @ f1.4 a ttile more useful than 50mm @ 1.4, which in turn is a little more useful than 75mm @ 1.4 because I need a fast lens indoors more often than I need it outdoors, and inddors, a wide lens is more more useful than a long lens. Also, for me, If I could have only one lens, I would choose the 50mm, with a 35mm a reluctant possibility. I would be markedly less happy with anything else, including the 75mm. Anyway, each Leica lens at different focal lengths has its own use, so it depends a lot on how you photograph, close, far, low light, etc. To quote te Delphi oracle, the asnwer is "know thyself", as always. I had to sell my 75mm last year, but in time, I am sure I will get it again (same with 24mm). The good news is that with the dropping prices of film camera, I may be able to buy them at 1/2 the price. What a deal ! :-) Cheers, - Phong