Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 10/3/04 2:17 PM, "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> typed: > <snip> > > Q: What is the resolving power of the ZI lenses? > A: Very high and clearly above the resolution limits set by today's colour > film and/or scanning devices. > > <snip> > > In the various Leica lens reviews it is often stated that the best Leica > lenses exceed the recording capabilities of slow film. > This suggests to me that their lenses while very good are not as good as > the > best from Leicas. > simon jessurun Yes but as Erwin just said I think the gap between what the lens companies say about their glass and how the glass objectively tests out varies. The Zeiss (credibility) gap has always been the smallest. Their stuff will test out even better than what they imply perhaps. While the other companies you divide by two and round it out even lower. Not so now as this Zeiss 400 spec seems seems ridiculous and is not likely to be born out. Will they somehow be better for digital than other glass? Have they been better corrected for focus shift as you stop down than other glass? Lets hope their hype department has not taken over. It was the last glass company where this was not the case. Other than Leica I hope. Mark Rabiner Photography Portland Oregon http://rabinergroup.com/