Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 13:30, B. D. Colen wrote: > Sorry, Juan, but the pricing of the Digi back makes even less sense than > the usual Leica pricing, rather than more, because for the price of the > Leica back, one can buy a complete Canon EOS 1D MarkII - the entire > camera body, 8 mpg sensor, with all the bells and whistles. While one > may not want all the bells and whistles, one does have to wonder what is > so stunningly spectacular about the Digi back that it justifies the > price of a top of the line camera body. I think the R-Back makes sense if you already have a substantial investment in R lenses. $4995 may buy you a 1D II body, but you are still going to need new Canon lenses unless you are willing to use your R-glass with stop down metering, which would be clunky to say the least. But if you are starting from scratch the R-back doesn't seem like the most sensible solution. On a positive note, the Leica-R back may turn out to be a very strong performer. The chip is based on the same one used in medium format backs and unless they completely screw it up it will probably be a pretty nice. I would also bet good money that Leica is working on a fully digital camera. I would not be surprised if it is full frame and will end up costing as much as a 1Ds. This is a comparatively low volume, high profit specialized segment of the market and may just be the place for Leica to be. Feli