Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: MORE THAN... digi 2.
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Mon Sep 6 12:03:23 2004
References: <200409061310.i86D5qnI014235@server1.waverley.reid.org> <3.0.6.32.20040906102157.0081c100@pop.mail.yahoo.ca> <3.0.6.32.20040906131424.0081db70@pop.mail.yahoo.ca>

Dan C said:

> But you miss out on the opportunity to apply "channel mixer" to the colour
> image, to mimick the effect of applying colour filters to the camera lens.
> And who knows, what if your editor looks at the images and says, "too bad
> you wern't shooting in colour, I could have used some of these".<

Hi Dan,
>>But you miss out on the opportunity to apply "channel mixer"<<<

A:  This part I don't know what it is nor how to find it and what it'll do
in any event. But considering I don't use filters when shooting film, I
don't suppose this ""channel mixer" thing would make any difference
anyway.;-)

>>And who knows, what if your editor looks at the images and says, "too bad
> you wern't shooting in colour, I could have used some of these".<<<<

B:  This will never happen as I don't shoot for any editor unless we both
know what medium I'll be shooting in. Makes life easier and non-confusing.
:-)

ted



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: MORE THAN... digi 2.)
In reply to: Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Re: MORE THAN... R.I.P. ILFORD)
Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Re: MORE THAN... R.I.P. ILFORD)