Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Lab vs. home processing
From: durling at cox.net (Mike Durling)
Date: Sat Sep 4 06:33:32 2004
References: <2867578BB7767E45B3C9E3CBA9C5A65F13F1A8@smskpexmbx3.mskcc.root.mskcc.org> <4062016C.8050608@osheaven.net> <1080165813.23270.77.camel@creo_pc3>
 
About 20 years ago while I was working for a summer theatre I used 
replenished Microdol-X.  It seems to me I got the finest grain ever on 
that generation of Tri-X, but when I looked at those negatives later 
they wern't too sharp.  Can't swear it was the developer, but I suspect 
it was.

Mike D

Feli di Giorgio wrote:
> ...
> Does anyone here use a developer that is not discarded after one use,
> but replenished or this something that is only viable if you are
> processing large amounts of film. Is there an advantage to a 'ripened'
> solution?
> 
> 
> feli
> 
>
Replies: Reply from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing)
 In reply to: Message from saganicc at MSKCC.ORG (Saganich, Christopher/Medical Physics) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing.)
Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing.)
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Lab vs. home processing)